facebook pixel

“God, the Lord” by John Frame

From Concise Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Christian Belief

Who is God? The Bible most often describes him as LordLord is the name of a profoundly holy person in covenant relationship with us. This chapter will explore the meaning of God’s lordship in terms of his control, authority, and presence, as well as the related concepts of transcendence and immanence.

In this book I will introduce you to the discipline of systematic theology. I’ll discuss the nature of systematic theology itself in chapter 6. But I think we need to do some systematic theology together before we try to define it. Just for now, however, let me say that theology is the human attempt to apply the Bible to people’s questions and, indeed, to all human needs.

Systematic theology is topical theology. It studies the Bible not by going from Genesis to Revelation but by exploring topics treated in various parts of Scripture, like the topics of God, man, revelation, Christ, the last days. Theologians have sometimes called these topics loci, the Latin plural of locus (“place”). So systematic theology asks “whole Bible” questions: What does the whole Bible teach about God? About sin? About justification by faith? These are some of the topics we’ll be looking at.

This book is an introductory survey of systematic theology, and therefore it will not cover each topic in great detail. Many theologians give book-length treatment to, say, God and man, or the person and work of Christ, or the events of the last days.[1] In this book, however, we will be covering briefly, in twenty-five chapters, the whole content of systematic theology. I’ll try to give you the main gist of each doctrinal area, so that you will have a good foundation. I hope it will motivate some of you to study some specific areas more intensively.

This first chapter, not surprisingly, is about God. In fact, we’ll spend three chapters on the doctrine of God, what some theologians call theology proper, because even in a survey this is the foundation for everything else.[2] How important it is to know God! Jesus prayed to his Father, “This is eternal life, that they may know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent” (John 17:3).

Who is God, anyway? The WSC in one of its most famous definitions says, “God is a Spirit, infinite, eternal, and unchangeable, in his being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth” (WSC 4). That’s an excellent statement. I think that everything in that statement is biblical. But it’s interesting to note that the Bible doesn’t contain this kind of definition of God.

How, then, does the Bible introduce us to God? It begins with an act of God: “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth” (Gen. 1:1). I believe Moses wrote the book of Genesis, and he wrote it for the benefit of the people of Israel, whom God had delivered miraculously from slavery in Egypt. These people didn’t need a definition of God. They already knew who God was. He was the one who led them out of Egypt. So the book of Genesis does not include a definition. It begins by telling the people that the God they know already, the God who led them out of Egypt, is also the one who created the heavens and the earth.

How did the Israelites of Moses’ generation come to know God? First through the stories of their forefathers. When God spoke to Moses, he identified himself as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. But to the Israelites these three patriarchs were ancient history. God had helped them centuries earlier. When Moses was born, Israel had been in Egypt for four hundred years. Originally the Egyptians had been friendly to them, but later pharaohs arose who hated them and subjected them to slavery. Israel cried out to God for help, but for those four hundred years God was silent. Many Israelites must have wondered why God did not answer their cries for help. Perhaps some of them even doubted whether the old stories were true.

Yet God did answer their prayers. He began by appearing to Moses. We learn about this meeting between Moses and God in Exodus 3, and I think that passage is the real beginning of the biblical doctrine of God. We read about God in Genesis, but the author of Genesis met God in Exodus 3.

In this passage Moses sees a bush that burns but doesn’t burn up. The flames do not consume it. It turns out that the burning bush is a place where God is, a place where God wants to talk with Moses. God is everywhere, of course, but sometimes he makes his presence known in a very intense way. So God calls Moses and tells him to remove his shoes, for the area of the bush is holy ground. God identifies himself as the God of Moses’ father and of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He says that he has seen the affliction of Israel and has heard their cry. He now intends to bring them out of Egypt to the land of Canaan, which he promised to their forefathers. Moses is to be his prophet, his spokesman.

Understandably, Moses is overwhelmed by this responsibility. God assures him that he will be successful. God will deliver Israel, and they will worship God on this very mountain, the mountain of the burning bush. But Moses has another question: “If I come to the people of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ what shall I say to them?” (Ex. 3:13).

It seems like an odd question to us. What is God’s name? Why would Moses ask something like that? Today, we give our kids names like Billy or Susie without much thought of the meaning of those names. You might call your daughter Elizabeth because you think the name sounds good or because it was your grandmother’s name. But in the ancient Near East, names had meaning. Abram meant “high father,” and Abram’s new name, Abraham, given him by God, meant “father of a multitude.” Usually, when a father gave a name to his son, he chose a name that didn’t just sound good but conveyed something of his hopes for the child, or his feelings about the child, or the circumstances of the child’s birth. So to ask about God’s name is to seek information about him. To seek God’s name is to ask what kind of God he is.

We should be interested in God’s answer to Moses’ question. How does God identify himself? How does God say who he is to the author of the first books of the Bible? We wait with bated breath, on the edge of our seats, to hear God’s name.

God’s name is, at first, rather bewildering. “God said to Moses, ‘I am who I am.’ And he said, ‘Say this to the people of Israel, “I am has sent me to you”’” (Ex. 3:14). God here gives his name in a long form, “I am who I am,” and in a short form, simply “I am.” The long form is difficult Hebrew. It can be translated in present or future tenses, and the relative pronoun translated “who” in the English Standard Version of the Bible (esv hereafter) can be translated in a variety of other ways as well. I can’t explore all these translations here, but the main point is that God’s answer to Moses is mysterious, to say the least. Even the short form of the name, “I am,” is difficult. It is a familiar phrase, as when one says “I am John” or “I am a teacher.” But what can be meant by “I am” just by itself?

It will help us, however, to go on to verse 15: “God also said to Moses, ‘Say this to the people of Israel, “The Lord, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you. This is my name forever, and thus I am to be remembered throughout all generations.”’” Here we see the mysterious name in still a third form. We’ve seen it in a long form, a short form, and now a very short form, a one-word form translated “Lord.” The word Lord in the esv represents the word Yahweh in Hebrew. Yahweh is derived, evidently, from a form of the verb “to be,” so it is connected with the repeated “I am” in verse 14. Some older English Bibles render this word as “Jehovah,” but most of them now follow the example of the kjv and translate it “Lord.”

Verse 15 says that this is the way God wants to be known, the name by which he is to be remembered for all generations. So the English word “Lord”—representing the Hebrew Yahweh, another Hebrew word, adon, and the Greek kyrios—occurs over seven thousand times in our Bibles, mostly referring to God the Father or, and this is important, to Jesus Christ.

Our Jewish friends today often use Deuteronomy 6:4–5 as a kind of confession of faith: “Hear, O Israel: The Lordour God, the Lord is one.” This is a confession of lordship. There is only one God, and he is Yahweh, the Lord. The Christians of the NT also confessed lordship: Jesus is Lord (Rom. 10:9–10; 1 Cor. 12:3; Phil. 2:11). We should notice, too, that over and over again in Scripture, God says he is going to do this or that so that people “shall know that I am the Lord” (as Ex. 6:7; 7:5, 17; 8:22; 14:4; 29:46; Isa. 45:6; 49:23, 26; Jer. 16:21; 24:7; etc.). So we may say that “God is Lord” is the fundamental confession of the people of God in the OT. The fundamental confession of the NT people of God is “Jesus is Lord.” That is a way of summarizing the main content of the Bible: “God is Lord” is the message of the OT; “Jesus is Lord” is the message of the NT.

So if we want to know the God of Scripture, we must come to know his lordship. There are, of course, many other concepts that are helpful in understanding God, such as the “infinite, eternal, unchangeable” of the WSC, and we will look at some of those. But we need to start somewhere, and it would be hard to find any starting point more appropriate than that of lordship. So we ask, what does it mean for God to be Lord?

To begin with, I should emphasize that Lord is a personal name. So our God is a person. That is a tremendously important fact. We know that in our world there are personal beings, like Joey, Cindy, Yo-Yo Ma, Sammy Sosa, George Bush, and so on. The world also contains impersonal beings, like rocks, trees, the law of gravity, tornadoes, Brussels sprouts, matter, motion, space, time, and chance. Secularists usually try to argue that the personal reduces to the impersonal: in the end, Joey, Cindy, and Yo-Yo Ma are ultimately just matter, motion, space, time, and chance. But the Bible teaches the opposite: the impersonal reduces to the personal. Matter, motion, space, time, and chance are, ultimately, tools used by one great Person to organize and run the universe he has made.

Another point that we can get from Exodus 3 is that the Lord is a supremely holy person. That is, he is separate from us and transcendent over us. We may not approach him without supreme respect. Holiness also means that God is supremely righteous and good, and that he must cross a great barrier to have any fellowship with sinners like you and me. But more of that later.

The main meaning of the name Lord is that he is the head of a covenant. In a covenant, God takes a people to be his. The heart of it, often recorded in Scripture, is his saying, “I will be their God, and they shall be my people” (Heb. 8:10; cf. Ex. 6:7; Lev. 26:12; Jer. 7:23; 11:4; 2 Cor. 6:16; Rev. 21:3). He rules them by his law (in a written document, as we will see), and he delivers them from destruction and death. So the covenant includes both law and grace. We’ll think some more about covenants in chapter 9.

The name Lord also tells us about his nature, what kind of God he is. Scripture typically associates three ideas with the idea of lordship, to which I’ve given the names controlauthority, and presence. I warned you that this book would include a lot of threefold distinctions. This is the first of them, and there will be a lot of others that coordinate with these. I will call these the lordship attributes. Let’s look at them in turn.

Control

When God comes to Moses and identifies himself as Lord, he comes in power. He heard the cry of the Israelites, and he comes to deliver them from the oppression of the Egyptians, with a mighty hand and a strong arm. Pharaoh is the most powerful totalitarian ruler of his day, and the might of Egypt is thought to be invulnerable. But God works powerful miracles and gains a decisive victory over Egypt’s land, its rulers, its armies, and its gods (Ex. 12:12; 15:11; 18:11). He is gracious to whom he will be gracious, and he shows mercy to whom he will show mercy (Ex. 33:19). So he judges Egypt but saves Israel. What he intends to do, he accomplishes. Nothing is too hard for him (Jer. 32:27; Gen. 18:14). His word is never void of power (Isa. 55:11). His prophecies always come to pass (Deut. 18:21–22).

This is what we often call the sovereignty of God. Everything that happens in the world comes from him. He is the one who sends rain, thunder, and lightning (Pss. 65:9–11; 135:6–7; 147:15–18). He makes things freeze, then melts the ice. The smallest details of nature are under his control: the falling of a sparrow, the number of hairs on your head (Matt. 6:26–30; 10:29–30). And the events that we call random, that we ascribe to chance, are really God at work. Look at Proverbs 16:33: “The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the Lord.” Just roll dice. Whether you get a six or an eight or a twelve, the number comes from God; it’s God’s decision.

God rules not only the little things but the big things, too. How could it be otherwise, since the big things are combinations of little things? He determines what nations will dwell in which territory (Acts 17:26). He decides what king is to rule, when, and where (Isa. 44:28). He decides whether the purpose of a nation will stand or fall (Ps. 33:10–11). And he decided, once, that wicked people would take the life of his own dear Son, so that we, we sinners, might live (Acts 2:23–24).

God rules not only the important events of human history but also the lives of individual people like you and me. He knits us together in our mothers’ wombs (Ps. 139:13–16). He decides whether we will travel or stay home (James 4:13–17).

Does this mean that God controls even our free decisions? Certainly he does. Joseph’s brothers sold him into slavery in order to harm him. That was their free decision, and they are responsible for it. But ultimately, it was God who used their evil deed to accomplish his good purpose (Gen. 45:5–8). Indeed, Scripture often ascribes to God even the sinful behavior of human beings. He made Israel’s enemies to hate her (Ps. 105:24–25). He hardened Pharaoh’s heart against his people (Ex. 4:21; Rom. 9:18). He moved Judas, Herod, and Pontius Pilate to bring about the death of Jesus (Acts 2:23; 4:28).

But God also works wondrously to bring good! God’s power, God’s control, also brings about our faith and repentance, so that we can have eternal life in Christ. Paul says, “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them” (Eph. 2:8–10). Faith is not something we work up in ourselves. God gives it to us as his gift. He opens our heart to believe (Acts 16:14–15). We believe because he appoints us to eternal life (Acts 13:48). He draws us to himself (John 6:44), gives us faith (John 6:65; Phil. 1:29). Yes, we also choose him, but he chooses us first (Eph. 1:4; John 1:12).

God’s control means that he is sovereign over everything that happens in the whole universe. Hear these passages:

Who has spoken and it came to pass,

   unless the Lord has commanded it?

Is it not from the mouth of the Most High

   that good and bad come? (Lam. 3:37–38)

And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. (Rom. 8:28)

In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will. (Eph. 1:11)

Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!

   “For who has known the mind of the Lord,

         or who has been his counselor?”

   “Or who has given a gift to him

         that he might be repaid?”

For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen. (Rom. 11:33–36)

Here, in the very first chapter of the survey, I am teaching you the doctrine of predestination. I know predestination is difficult. We ask, for example, if God predestines everything, what happens to human freedom? Good question. We’ll deal with it in chapter 7. Another important question is, how can God bring evil things to pass if he is holy, just, and good? That’s a real difficult one, and it has brought a lot of grief to some people. We’ll have to look at that carefully, but we can’t do it now. I hope you can wait until chapter 8 for our discussion of the problem of evil. For now, I will say only that when God brings about human sinful actions, he does it for his own good purposes. We may not always know what those purposes are, but God assures us that they are good. And he assures us of his goodness and justice by sending his own Son to die for our sins.

Authority

The second of the three lordship attributes is his authority. God’s authority is his right to tell his creatures what they must do. Control is about might; authority is about right. Control means that God makes everything happen; authority means that God has the right to be obeyed, and therefore we have the obligation to obey him.

God’s authority is part of his lordship. When God meets with Moses in Exodus 3, he gives him an authoritative message—Let my people go, that they may serve me—which has authority even over Pharaoh (Ex. 4:12). When God meets with Israel at Mount Sinai, he identifies himself as Lord (Ex. 20:1–2) and then tells them to have no other gods before him (v. 3). God’s lordship means that we must obey his Ten Commandments and any other commandments he chooses to give us. So God calls us to confess his lordship and then go on to obey all his commandments (Deut. 6:4–6). Jesus, too, says over and over again, in various ways, “If you love me, keep my commandments” (John 14:21, 23; 15:10, 14; 1 John 2:3–6; 3:22, 24; 5:3; 2 John 6; Rev. 12:17; 14:12). “How,” he asks, “can you call me ‘Lord, Lord,’ when you don’t do the things I say?” (Luke 6:46 paraphrased; cf. Matt. 7:21–22).

God’s authority is absolute. That means, first, that we shouldn’t doubt or question it. Paul says that Abraham “wavered not” in his belief in God’s promise (Rom. 4:16–22). Abraham was certainly tempted to waver. God had promised him the land of Canaan, but although he lived there, he owned not one square inch. God had promised him a son, who would in turn have more descendants than the sand of the sea. But Abraham’s wife, Sarah, was beyond the age of childbearing, and Abraham was over one hundred years old before the promise was fulfilled. Nevertheless, Abraham clung to God’s authoritative word, even against the evidence of his senses. And so should we.

Second, the absoluteness of God’s authority means that his lordship transcends all our other loyalties. We are right to be loyal to our parents, our nation, our friends; but God calls us to love him with all our heart, that is, without any rival. Jesus told his disciples to honor their parents (Matt. 15:3–6), but he told them to honor him even more (Matt. 10:34–38; cf. Matt. 8:19–22; 22:37; Phil. 3:7–8).

Third, to say that God’s authority is absolute means that it covers all areas of human life. Paul says that “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31; cf. Rom. 14:23; Col. 3:17, 24; 2 Cor. 10:5). Everything we do is either to God’s glory or it is not. God has the right to order every aspect of human life.

Covenant Presence

God’s lordship means that he controls everything and speaks with absolute authority. There is also a third element to God’s lordship, and in some ways this is the deepest and most precious. That element is his commitment to us and, therefore, his presence with us.

As noted earlier, the essence of the covenant is God’s word, “I will be your God, and you will be my people.” God said that to Israel under Moses (Ex. 6:7) and to the NT people of God (2 Cor. 6:16). He declared this promise many times throughout Scripture (Gen. 17:7; Ex. 6:7; 29:45; Lev. 26:12; Jer. 7:23; 11:4; 24:7; 30:22; Ezek. 11:20; 14:11; 36:28; 37:27; Heb. 11:16; Rev. 21:3). This means that the covenant Lord is one who takes people to be his own.

When God takes us to be his people, he fights our battles, blesses us, loves us, and sometimes gives us special judgments because of our sins (as Amos 3:2). Most importantly, he is with us. He places his name upon us (Num. 6:27), so that he dwells with us and we with him. In the OT, God literally dwelled with Israel, as he placed his theophany, his visible presence, in the tabernacle and then in the temple. In the NT, Jesus is Immanuel, “God with us” (Isa. 7:14; Matt. 1:23; cf. Gen. 21:22; 26:28; 28:15; 39:3–4). He is God “tabernacling” among us (John 1:14). And after his resurrection, he sends the Spirit to dwell in us, as in a temple (1 Cor. 3:16).

Control, authority, presence. Those are the main biblical concepts that explain the meaning of God’s lordship.

Transcendence and Immanence

These lordship attributes, as I call them, will help us to get a clear idea of the concepts of transcendence and immanence that theologians often use to describe the biblical God. These are not biblical terms, but the Bible does speak of God’s being “on high” (Ps. 113:5, cf. 123:1; Isa. 5:16) as well as “with us.” He is both “up there” and “down here.” He is exalted, and he is near. When Scripture uses the “up there” language, theologians call it transcendence. When Scripture speaks of God “down here” with us, the theologians speak of immanence.

There are dangers, however, in the concepts of transcendence and immanence. I think, for example, that some theologians have misunderstood God’s transcendence. They think it means that God is so far away from us that we cannot really know him, so far that human language can’t describe him accurately, so far that to us he’s just a great heavenly blur without any definite characteristics. This concept of transcendence is unbiblical. If God is transcendent in that way, how can he also be near to us? Furthermore, according to the Bible we can know definite things about God. Despite the limitations of human language, God is able to use human language to tell us clearly and accurately who he is and what he has done.

So I urge you to reject that theological concept of transcendence. If you are going to use that word at all, use it to describe God’s enthronement. When Scripture speaks of God as “high,” “exalted,” “lifted up,” it is not saying that he lives far away from us so that we can’t know him. Rather, it’s saying that God is King, that he is Lord. In other words, biblical transcendence is God’s lordship attributes of control and authority.

Similarly, you should use the word immanence, if you use it at all, to describe God’s covenant presence. Some theologians speak as though when God becomes immanent he becomes immersed in the world, hidden in the world, so that he cannot be distinguished from creaturely reality. But that is not biblical. God is always distinct from the world, for he is the Creator and we are the creature. Yet he is clearly revealed in the world (Ps. 19:1; Rom. 1:18–21). God does come to be with creatures, and that’s something wonderful and precious.

Objections to Lordship as a Central Focus

There are, of course, a lot of perspectives by which to look at Scripture, and I think that lordship is an especially valuable one, simply because it is so central to the Bible itself. But some theologians have preferred other approaches. Some, for example, prefer to focus on God’s love and mercy. I agree that these are important, but I think their importance is most obvious from a lordship perspective. God’s love and mercy are aspects of his covenant presence with his people. Furthermore, God’s sovereignty magnifies his love and mercy, displaying their power, assuring us that his love always accomplishes his purpose.

To some, of course, the very emphasis on divine sovereignty is to be avoided. They want to leave more room for human free will (see chap. 7). But divine sovereignty, with the doctrine of predestination, is an important part of the Bible.

Others may object that the idea of lordship suggests medieval feudalism. It is important that we understand lordship first in biblical terms, not in terms of human cultures. The biblical view of God’s lordship is very different from feudalism, though there are some things in common. The main difference is God’s absolute control and authority, coupled with his presence with his people.

Another objection is that to focus on lordship obscures other biblical emphases. Certainly, any model emphasizes some biblical truth somewhat at the expense of other truth. The reason is that theology is not the Bible. Theology restates the truths of the Bible, so inevitably its emphasis will differ from Scripture itself. The only way to remedy that problem is to restrict theology so that it does nothing but read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation.

Certainly, lordship may profitably be balanced with other models, such as God as Father, Husband, and Redeemer. Of all these, I believe that lordship is most comprehensive, both in its pervasiveness throughout Scripture and in its ability to include and explain other models.

The first thing to remember about God is that he is Lord, Yahweh, the I am. As the Lord, he is the personal, holy, head of the covenant. He is in full control of the world he has made, speaks to us with absolute authority, and commits himself to us as Immanuel, God with us.

Key Terms

  • authority
  • control
  • covenant presence
  • God
  • immanence
  • Lord
  • lordship attributes
  • sovereignty of God
  • systematic theology
  • theology proper
  • transcendence
  • Yahweh

Study Questions

  1.  Frame uses three terms to describe God’s lordship. What are these lordship attributes, and how does he explain each one?

  2.  How did the Israelites of Moses’ generation come to know God?

  3.  What is the fundamental confession of the people of God in the OT? In the NT?

  4.  Describe what the title Lord means in the Bible—especially what is meant by the English word Lord in the Bible.

  5.  Frame says: “The main meaning of the name Lord is that he is the head of a covenant.” Discuss.

  6.  In what senses is God’s authority absolute?

  7.  Frame says: “God rules not only the little things but the big things, too.” Give biblical evidence.

  8.  Give an example from Scripture where you see the control aspect of God’s lordship.

  9.  If control is about God’s might, then authority is about God’s ______________.

10.  Give an example from Scripture of God’s authority being demonstrated.

11.  Why does Frame make presence (or covenant presence) a necessary part of God’s lordship? Why is this significant?

12.  What do the terms transcendence and immanence mean? Describe these, using everyday language.

13.  Discuss Frame’s statement that “the impersonal reduces to the personal.”

14.  Why does Frame believe that lordship is the best model for understanding who God is and for organizing a systematic theology?

15.  What are the main objections to using lordship as a central organizing principle for systematic theology?

Memory Verses

Ex. 3:13–15: Then Moses said to God, “If I come to the people of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ what shall I say to them?” God said to Moses, “I am who I am.” And he said, “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘I am has sent me to you.’” God also said to Moses, “Say this to the people of Israel, ‘The Lord, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, and thus I am to be remembered throughout all generations.”

Rev. 21:3–4: And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.”

Resources for Further Study

In addition to the specific suggestions that I make at the end of each chapter, it will be valuable for the student to compare the discussions here with those of other systematic theologies, such as those of Charles Hodge, Herman Bavinck, Louis Berkhof, Wayne Grudem, Robert Reymond, Douglas Kelly, and Richard Gamble.[1]

Frame, John M. DG. The first seven chapters present a fuller exegetical defense of my triperspectival understanding of divine lordship.

———. DKG. This book develops in detail my triperspectival epistemology, in contrast with non-Christian views of knowledge.


John M. Frame is the author of Concise Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Christian Belief.

John M. Frame (BD, Westminster Theological Seminary; AM, MPhil, Yale University; DD, Belhaven College) is J. D. Trimble Professor of Systematic Theology and Philosophy, Emeritus, Reformed Theological Seminary, Orlando. He is the author of many books, including the four-volume Theology of Lordship series, and previously taught theology and apologetics at Westminster Theological Seminary (Philadelphia) and at Westminster Seminary California.


[1] For my own efforts along these same lines, see my DKGDG, and DCL.

[2] The word theology literally means “study of God,” so it is applied to this locus in a “proper” way. But of course, the word is used more broadly to cover any exposition of the content of a religion, in this case the Christian faith.

[3] Ed. Note. Also those by Joel Beeke and Paul M. Smalley, and Robert Letham.


God’s Strength in Our Weakness by Trent Casto

While I was pastoring a small church during my seminary years, Paul’s second letter to the Corinthians was the firstbook of the Bible I ever preached. It is a testament to how little I knew then that out of all the books of the Bible, I would choose to preach this one first. And yet, as is always the case, the Lord’s strength was made manifest in myweakness. Sixteen years later, and still not really knowing what I was getting into, I was led to preach again through this letter to the people of Covenant Church of Naples. When I planned the series, “God’s Strength in Our Weakness,”

I had no idea of the events that would unfold in the year 2020. But God knew. And week after week he spoke to us through this holy and inspired text. In a year when I felt more keenly than ever my own weakness as a pastor, the Lordwas bringing forth his strength.

Many of these sermons were originally applied to the pressing issues of 2020, such as our individual and collective responses to the COVID19 pandemic, tremendous racial tensions, and a deeply contentious presidential election.Preachers of the Word must apply the truth of the gospel to the people in their local context with specificity. Interest-ingly, the sermons that packed the most powerful punch in real time because of their specificity tended to be the weak- est when I revisited them more than a year after the events they related to. In editing, I have sought to expand those applications for a more universal time and audience. I trust that in these general applications pastors will still see pathsto more specific application among your own people for the pressing needs of the day.

Additionally, I have sought to keep the text of each chapter of this commentary as close to the actual sermon I preached as possible, showing mostly only the fruit of my exegetical work rather than the work itself. But I have made use of footnotes where I thought it would be helpful for preachers and teachers to see why I came to the conclusions I did. Moreover, I have included some additional quotes in the footnotes that did not make it into my sermons, but may well be low-hanging fruit for your own purposes.

In my opinion, 2 Corinthians is Paul’s most intensely personal and pastoral letter of all. This fact makes it difficult in many instances to fully grasp what he is driving at, and also at times gives the letter a disjointed feel. Consequently,some excellent scholars believe that the letter should not be understood as one unified whole. While I acknowledge the difficulties, I will attempt to show in my exposition that 2 Corinthians is still best understood as one cohesive letter, asall the extant manuscripts indicate.

With this preface, I also offer this prayer for you who teach and preach God’s Word. May the God who said, “Let light shine out of darkness” shine in your hearts “to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ” (2 Cor. 4:6).


Trent Casto (MDiv, Covenant Theological Seminary; DMin, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary) is the author of 2 Corinthians and senior pastor at Covenant Church of Naples (PCA) in Naples, Florida. He and his wife, Emily, have three children. Visit Trent’s blog at https://trentcasto.com/.

Author Interview with Derek Cooper

The following is an interview with Derek Cooper. He is the author of Christianity and New Religious Movements: An Introduction to the World’s Newest Faiths and Christianity and World Religions: An Introduction to the World’s Major Faiths.

  • What led you to write Christianity and New Religious Movements? How did you become interested in exploring this topic and critiquing it from a biblical perspective?

There are two primary factors that led me to write this book. First, I had received so much positive feedback from my previous book with P&R titled “Christianity and World Religions: An Introduction to the World’s Major Faiths.” That book explored how Christians can and should engage major world religions like Islam, Buddhism, and Hinduism. A lot of readers appreciated the spirit of that book and asked me what book I could recommend for learning about and engaging newer religions like Mormonism, Jehovah’s Witness, and Scientology. I wanted to provide a book that would fill that void.

Second, I have been interested in newer religions for most of my life. As I mention about in the book, I grew up very close to the headquarters of the Branch Davidians, a new religious movement that captured national headlines in the 1990s during the so-called Waco Siege in Texas. Those events made me aware of religious traditions that had branched outside of mainstream world religions. I wondered where they came from and why they believed what they did. As I got older and entered the academic field of religious studies, I noticed that there were not too many book resources available that taught about new religious movements in a compassionate way yet remained committed to traditional Christianity. This led me to wanting to write a book about new religious movements from a biblical worldview.

  • What are the main things you learned from researching your book; what do you consider the “big takeaways” to be?

I learned a lot as I researched for this book and met with countless practitioners of new religious movements. For me, I think it’s always important to combine both theory and practice. It’s one thing to know theoretically what people believe, but it can sometimes be another thing to see what they believe practiced in real life. I’m thankful for the leaders and practitioners whose personal experiences supplemented my academic research.

One of my major takeaways is that I’m thankful for the Christian Church as it has safeguarded, preserved, and defended traditional Christianity over the course of 2,000 years. The pressure to change, to compromise, and to evolve never goes away and remains a constant within Christianity. There are literally tens of thousands of different denominations or sects that claim a Christian heritage, demonstrating how difficult it is to stay on the narrow path. As Jesus said in the Sermon on the Mount, “the gate is narrow, and the way is hard that leads to life” (Matt. 7:14). While writing this book, I was reminded of this passage often. I also realized that other religious traditions encountered a similar phenomenon. How do we hold on to something when we are constantly in motion?

Another takeaway is that there are a lot of reasons why people join new religious movements, but one common theme I encountered was that people were ultimately seeking a sense of belonging. They wanted to be part of a community that valued them and gave them a sense of purpose and kinship. This saddened me to think about how the Church has not always been a place where people feel safe and valued and loved.

  • What are some important truths that you would like readers to remember from reading CNRM?

First, I would like readers to remember that people are desperately hungry for truth and meaning. The fact that so many people throughout history have sought out a relationship with God, however imperfectly, is a testimony to how much humankind is searching. This provides the Church with a real opportunity to share the message of Jesus Christ and live out our calling to love God and love others.

Second, I would like to remind readers of Jesus’s plea for us to be “as wise as serpents and as innocent as doves” (Matt. 10:16). We need to cultivate wisdom because there are plenty of wolves in sheep’s clothing. For instance, there are many new religious movements that say one thing publicly but practice another thing privately. As such, being shrewd, discerning, and wise are essential in this day and age. But as a complement, Jesus urges us to be “innocent,” which is a rarely used Greek word in the New Testament (ἀκέραιος) that could be translated as “whole,” “honest,” “gentle,” or “harmless.” A lot of people in new religious movements have beaten up and are broken, and the last thing they need is for someone else to push them down even further. There are ways of coming alongside people and helping them up in a gentle way that does not do additional damage.

Finally, I would like to remind readers of Ecclesiastes, which tells us that “there is nothing new under the sun” (Eccl. 1:9). It’s tempting to be lured into something different because it is new. It may come across as more relevant, more sophisticated, or more authentic. I can empathize with this. And to state the opposite, something is not right just because it is old. But as a Christian, my study of new religious movements has pushed me back toward the core of our classic Christian beliefs and practices, which do not change, and which are not subject to the revolving door of our constantly changing culture. In fact, we have wonderful examples from Scripture and church tradition of Christians who remained innocent with regard to the truth yet wise in relation to the world. 

An Interview with Author Valerie Elliot Shepard

The following is taken from an interview with Valerie Elliot Shepard and Joy Woo. Valerie is the author of our upcoming release, Pilipinto: The Jungle Adventures of a Missionary’s Daughter, which will be available August 2, 2023.

1) Aside from sharing your story through writing, how do you currently spend your time?

Walking, cooking, gardening, reading the Bible and praying, attending a prayer meeting every Wednesday afternoon at our church, watching interesting movies with my husband, trying to write a few letters a week (as opposed to at least 75-100 as my mother did!), and reading some. 

2) How did you come up with the idea to tell your family’s story through Pilipinto?

It was my mother’s idea originally, back in the early ’90s, and she gave me a few clues to refresh my memory. But because of having my children at home and homeschooling, this project really didn’t “get going” until the 2009–2011 years, when all my children had left home. 

3) What was it like to reflect on your past for this project? Did you learn anything about your childhood or your family that you didn’t know before?

It was a fun project because I had such a happy childhood! I’m not sure I learned anything new about my childhood, other than discovering some notes my mother had taken in 1960-63, which were about things I said or did, and they were quite amusing.

4) What is something you hope parents and their children will learn about the Lord as they read Pilipinto?

I sincerely hope that the presence, help, and protection of our heavenly Father and Jesus our tender Shepherd comes out loud and clear. He obviously took care of and protected us in a very unusual setting, and I was oblivious to it, except by listening to my mother’s prayers every night and learning the beautiful old hymn “The Lord’s My Shepherd.” 

I think when parents speak lovingly and seriously about the presence and help of our Savior, it makes a huge impact on their children, and I am so grateful for my mother’s careful, loving, and truthful parenting. She never told me silly untruths or gave promises of what she would do for me that she didn’t follow through with, so I could trust her implicitly! I’m so thankful for that because it created a very secure and happy environment for me! 

5) Do you have a favorite page or illustration from the book?

That’s a very difficult question because most of the pages bring a smile to my face, so it’s hard to say, but one of my favorites is the page with my singing to my Daddy in heaven and the blue butterfly.


PREORDER PILIPINTO: THE JUNGLE ADVENTURES OF A MISSIONARY’S DAUGHTER

“Young ones will learn about the Elliot family and their global influence, not only on the people of an ancient tribe but on Christians around the world. Thank you, Valerie, for telling your family’s remarkable story to yet another generation.”

–Joni Eareckson Tada, Founder, Joni and Friends International Disability Center


An Interview with Author Greg Welty

The following is an interview with Greg Welty. He is the author of Alvin Plantinga, the most recent release in our Great Thinkers series.

Greg Welty (MDiv, Westminster Seminary California; MPhil, DPhil, Oriel College, University of Oxford) is professor of philosophy at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is the author of Why Is There Evil in the World? and coeditor of Calvinism and Middle-Knowledge: A Conversation.

1. What led you to write Alvin Plantinga? How did you become interested in exploring his teaching and critiquing it from a biblical perspective?

My good friend James Anderson at RTS-Charlotte seminary let me know that a volume on Alvin Plantinga was likely in P&R’s Great Thinkers series. (Anderson himself wrote the David Hume volume, which I really like.) So, I put together a proposal and things proceeded from there. In the Preface to the book I relate how hearing of Plantinga when I was an undergraduate philosophy student at UCLA in 1991 led me to initially examine his writings. Navigating the conflict I later discerned between Plantinga’s positions and those of my Oxford supervisor, Richard Swinburne, led me to become a philosopher: to become aware of multiple views held by equally capable individuals, and to consider deeply who had the better argument.

I think it’s not only important to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a thinker in light of a biblical perspective, but to rank the importance of these as well, and I try to do that in the book. Some of the ways that Plantinga’s work isn’t fully or clearly in line with the Reformed confessions are easily remediable; others not so much. But overall I find a lot of value in Plantinga’s body of work, and I’ve taught through it for twenty years or so.

2. What are the main things you learned from researching Alvin Plantinga; what do you consider his main contributions to Reformed epistemology to be?

I learned that Bill Davis at Covenant College was the perfect person to write the foreword to the book! As one of Plantinga’s students and teaching assistants, who observed him up close for years, Bill is happy to commend Plantinga as a deep, genuine, sincere believer in Jesus Christ. Bill also makes the highly relevant observation that some Christian philosophers are mainly called to speak to fellow Christians about the world of philosophy, while others are mainly called to speak to fellow philosophers about Christian beliefs, and Plantinga is in the latter, almost evangelistic, category.

I also learned that Plantinga’s model of faith and reason, and of how we come to know the Bible is the word of God, is remarkably like John Owen’s view, something that I didn’t realize until I read Owen’s The Reason of Faith (1677) after writing the Plantinga book. In The Reason of Faith (1677: 169-76), Owen makes a series of points that are virtually identical to points made by Plantinga in Warranted Christian Belief(2000: 256-66) and Where the Conflict Really Lies (2011: 178-83). These include the idea that reason is composed of multiple cognitive faculties (both noninferential and inferential), that faith is trust in divine testimony, full-stop (no further arguments needed), and that faith and reason are two ways of knowing. Faith is not an intellectually substandard source of belief. Rather, it’s just a different way to get knowledge.

I learned a few other things. Plantinga found it very difficult to figure out what it means to be a Christian philosopher. He devoted a lot of time at the University of Notre Dame to thinking about this issue. There’s a difference between being a Christian philosopher and being a philosopher who happens to be a Christian. Plantinga wrote a lot about this question—by my reckoning, he articulates five methodological principles and four distinct activities of the Christian philosopher. But he found it hard to practice the integration of Christianity and philosophy. With two notable exceptions (Warranted Christian Belief and “O felix culpa”), most of his philosophical work is about “mere theism,” not Christian distinctives. In the book I offer a reason why that is.

I also learned that, surprisingly, only two of Plantinga’s seven replies to the problem of evil depend on libertarian free will. I learned that Plantinga’s extended “Aquinas/Calvin model” of faith is compatible with determinism about saving faith. Finally, I learned that Plantinga’s rejection of various elements of classical theism doesn’t affect the cogency of his arguments all that much. (As far as I can tell, you can just add these elements to his views if you’d like.)

In my view, Plantinga’s “Reformed epistemology” is neither distinctively Reformed, nor an epistemology. It is, however, a clever reply to the insistence of unbelievers that our belief in God must be based on argument to be rational! His later and much more developed theory of ‘warranted Christian belief’ gives a central role to the testimony of Scripture and the work of the Holy Spirit in producing faith, and deploys this model to deflect some influential unbelieving criticisms of Christian faith.

3. What are some important truths that you would like readers to remember from reading Alvin Plantinga?

In the providence of God, Plantinga influenced a generation of Christian philosophers to be rigorous and bold in their defense of distinctive Christian claims. Like all other uninspired-but-very-useful thinkers, he finds his proper place not above us or below us, but at our side, helping us think through—as he would put it—the antitithesis between believing and unbelieving ways of thought.


ORDER Alvin Plantinga